The psychometric property of a short-form of the Social Axioms Survey (SAS II) | BMC Psychology

The psychometric property of a short-form of the Social Axioms Survey (SAS II) | BMC Psychology

[ad_1]

  • Leung Ok, Bond MH, De Carrasquel SR, Muñoz C, Hernández M, Murakami F, et al. Social axioms: the Seek for Common Dimensions of Common Beliefs about how the World capabilities. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2002;33:286–302.

    Google Scholar

  • Bond MH, Leung Ok, Au A, Tong Ok, Chemonges-Nielson Z. Combining social axioms with values in predicting social behaviours. Eur J Private. 2004;18:177–91.

    Google Scholar

  • Leung Ok, Bond MH, Schwartz SH. The best way to clarify cross-cultural variations: values, valences, and expectations. Asian J Psychol. 1995;1:70–5.

    Google Scholar

  • Leung Ok, Bond MH. Social axioms: a mannequin for Social beliefs in Multicultural Perspective. Advances in experimental social psychology. Elsevier; 2004. 119–97.

  • Leung Ok, Zhou F. Values and Social axioms. Handbook of motivation and cognition throughout cultures. Elsevier; 2008. 471–90.

  • Leung Ok, Lam BCP, Bond MH, Conway LG, Gornick LJ, Amponsah B, et al. Growing and evaluating the Social axioms Survey in Eleven international locations: its Relationship with the five-factor mannequin of persona. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2012;43:833–57.

    Google Scholar

  • Leung Ok, Au A, Huang X, Kurman J, Niit T, Niit Ok-Ok. Social axioms and values: a cross-cultural examination. Eur J Private. 2007;21:91–111.

    Google Scholar

  • Bond MH, Leung Ok, Au A, Tong Ok-Ok, De Carrasquel SR, Murakami F, et al. Tradition-Stage dimensions of Social axioms and their correlates throughout 41 cultures. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2004;35:548–70.

    Google Scholar

  • Boski P, Biłas-Henne M, Wiȩckowska J. Cynicism in love and in politics. In: Leung Ok, Bond MH, editors. Psychological facets of Social axioms. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2009. pp. 239–66.

    Google Scholar

  • Joshanloo M, Afshari S, Rastegar P. Linking social axioms with indicators of optimistic interpersonal, social and environmental functioning in Iran: an exploratory examine. Int J Psychol. 2010;45:303–10.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar

  • Kurman J. What I do and what I believe they might do: Social axioms and Behaviour. Eur J Private. 2011;25:410–23.

    Google Scholar

  • Alfinito S, Siqueira MB, Torres CV. The coed’s alternative primarily based on client psychology: an evaluation utilized to larger training establishments of Brazil. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark. 2016;13:185–201.

    Google Scholar

  • Bernardo ABI, Cai Y, King RB. Society-level social axiom moderates the affiliation between development mindset and achievement throughout cultures. Br J Educ Psychol. 2021;91:1166–84.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar

  • Kwantes CT, Karam CM. Social axioms and organizational habits. Psychol Asp Soc Axioms Underst Glob Perception Syst. 2009;:31–50.

  • Kwantes CT, Karam CM, Kuo BC, Towson S. Tradition’s affect on the notion of OCB as in-role or extra-role. Int J Intercult Relat. 2008;32:229–43.

    Google Scholar

  • Bernardo ABI, Nalipay MJN. Social axioms as social foundations of locus-of-hope: a examine in three Asian cultural teams. Private Individ Differ. 2016;95:110–3.

    Google Scholar

  • Dincă M, Iliescu D. Linking social axioms with behavioral indicators and persona in Romania. In: Leung Ok, Bond MH, editors. Psychological facets of Social axioms. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2009. pp. 145–62.

    Google Scholar

  • Lam BCP, Bond MH, Chen SX, Wu WCH. Worldviews and particular person vulnerability to Suicide: the function of Social axioms. Eur J Private. 2010;24:602–22.

    Google Scholar

  • Tong KK, Chen JH, Yu EW, Wu AMS. Adherence to COVID-19 precautionary measures: making use of the Well being Perception Mannequin and Generalised Social Beliefs to a Likelihood Neighborhood Pattern. Appl Psychol Well being Effectively-Being. 2020;12:1205–23.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar

  • Yang HM, Tong KK, Li Y, Tao VYK, Zhang MX, Wu AMS. Testing the affect of Social axioms on Web Gaming Dysfunction tendency with a Cross-lagged Panel Mannequin: a one-year longitudinal examine. Int J Ment Well being Addict. 2022;20:2587–98.

    Google Scholar

  • Rastegar P. Social axioms as predictors of psychological and subjective well-being in Iran and England. Ph.D. College of Hertfordshire (United Kingdom); 2018.

  • Koenig LB. Change and Stability in Religiousness and spirituality in rising Maturity. J Genet Psychol. 2015;176:369–85.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar

  • Li Y, Tong KK, Tao VYK, Zhang MX, Wu AMS. Testing the associations amongst Social Axioms, College Belonging, and flourishing in College college students: a two-year longitudinal examine. Appl Psychol Well being Effectively-Being. 2020;12:749–69.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar

  • Breslin FC, Sobell LC, Sobell MB, Agrawal S. A comparability of a quick and lengthy model of the situational confidence questionnaire. Behav Res Ther. 2000;38:1211–20.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar

  • Donnellan MB, Oswald FL, Baird BM, Lucas RE. The Mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the massive 5 components of persona. Psychol Assess. 2006;18:192–203.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar

  • Gogol Ok, Brunner M, Goetz T, Martin R, Ugen S, Keller U, et al. My questionnaire is simply too lengthy! The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2014;39:188–205.

    Google Scholar

  • Laborde S, Allen MS, Guillén F. Assemble and concurrent validity of the short- and long-form variations of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire. Private Individ Differ. 2016;101:232–5.

    Google Scholar

  • Herzog AR, Bachman JG. Results of Questionnaire size on response high quality. Public Opin Q. 1981;45:549.

    Google Scholar

  • Soto CJ, John OP. Brief and extra-short types of the massive 5 Stock–2: the BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. J Res Private. 2017;68:69–81.

    Google Scholar

  • Colledani D, Anselmi P, Robusto E. Utilizing merchandise response idea for the event of a New Brief Type of the Eysenck persona questionnaire-revised. Entrance Psychol. 2018;9:1834.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar

  • Zaidman-Zait A, Mirenda P, Zumbo BD, Wellington S, Dua V, Kalynchuk Ok. An merchandise response idea evaluation of the parenting stress index-short kind with mother and father of youngsters with autism spectrum problems. J Youngster Psychol Psychiatry. 2010;51:1269–77.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar

  • Singelis TM, Hubbard C, Her P, An S. Convergent validation of the Social axioms Survey. Private Individ Differ. 2003;34:269–82.

    Google Scholar

  • Rotter JB. A brand new scale for the measurement of interpersonal belief. J Pers. 1967;35:651–65.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar

  • Martin MM, Rubin RB. A New measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychol Rep. 1995;76:623–6.

    Google Scholar

  • Rotter JB. Generalized expectations for inner versus exterior management of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr Gen Appl. 1966;80:1–28.

    Google Scholar

  • Tobacyk J, Milford G. Perception in paranormal phenomena: Evaluation instrument improvement and implications for persona functioning. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44:1029–37.

    Google Scholar

  • Hair JF, editor. Multivariate information evaluation. seventh ed. Higher Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Corridor; 2010.

    Google Scholar

  • Bond TG, Yan Z, Heene M. Making use of the Rasch mannequin: elementary measurement within the human sciences. Fourth ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2020.

    Google Scholar

  • Kang T, Chen TT. Efficiency of the generalized S-X2 Merchandise Match Index for Polytomous IRT fashions. J Educ Meas. 2008;45:391–406.

    Google Scholar

  • Chalmers RP. Mirt: a Multidimensional Merchandise Response Principle Bundle for the R atmosphere. J Stat Softw. 2012;48.

  • Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF. Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In: Homburg C, Klarmann M, Vomberg A, editors. Handbook of Market Analysis. Cham: Springer Worldwide Publishing; 2022. pp. 587–632.

    Google Scholar

  • Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of choosing and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for Reliability Analysis. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar

  • Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff standards for match indexes in covariance construction evaluation: typical standards versus new options. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.

    Google Scholar

  • Kline RB. Mannequin testing and indexing. Ideas and follow of structural equation modeling. fifth ed. Guilford Press; 2023. pp. 156–80.

  • Mulaik SA, James LR, Van Alstine J, Bennett N, Lind S, Stilwell CD. Analysis of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation fashions. Psychol Bull. 1989;105:430–45.

    Google Scholar

  • Putnick DL, Bornstein MH. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: the state-of-the-art and future instructions for psychological analysis. Dev Rev. 2016;41:71–90.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar

  • Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A evaluate and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: strategies, practices, and proposals for organizational analysis. Organ Res Strategies. 2000;3:4–70.

    Google Scholar

  • Liem AD, Hidayat SS, Soemarno S. Do common beliefs predict particular behavioral intentions in Indonesia? The function of social axioms throughout the idea of deliberate habits. Psychological facets of social axioms: understanding world perception techniques. Springer; 2009. 217–38.

  • Yang HM, Tong KK, Chen JH, Yu EW, Wu AMS. Rising amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: the interaction amongst transformational management in authorities, public belief, and posttraumatic development. J Pac Rim Psychol. 2023;17:183449092211462.

    Google Scholar

  • Olson Ok, Wagner J, Anderson R. Survey prices: the place are we and what’s the manner ahead? J Surv Stat Methodol. 2021;9:921–42.

    Google Scholar

  • Bègue L. Beliefs in justice and religion in folks: simply world, religiosity and interpersonal belief. Private Individ Differ. 2002;32:375–82.

    Google Scholar

  • Shiah Y-J, Wu M-H, Tam W-CC, Chang F. Paranormal beliefs and Religiosity: Chinese language model of the revised Paranormal Perception Scale. Psychol Rep. 2010;107:367–82.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar

  • McCrae RR, Kurtz JE, Yamagata S, Terracciano A. Inner consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for persona scale validity. Private Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15:28–50.

    Google Scholar

  • You may also like...

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *